-
The main argument for the split is that a board of directors should in theory be better able to monitor the performance of company executives if it is chaired by someone who is not one of these executives. This argument has become received wisdom in the UK and Canada, where over time most public companies have appointed an independent board chair. American companies, however, haven't yet been convinced (Read Full Article)
Bookmark or Share this article
Related Articles
- Human Resource Executive Online - Story
- also categorized in CEO Leadership
- Study: Company debt related to Ceo's personal finance habits | The ...
- also categorized in CEO Leadership
- Analyst At Large: Should the CEO also be the CFO?
- also categorized in CEO Leadership
- Ten Management Practices to Axe
- also written by BusinessWeek
- Baidu CEO draws big crowd in Google's backyard
- also mentions Chairman
- Clearly Define Success and Failure
- also written by BusinessWeek
- A Marketing Toolkit for Every Ceo | Igniting Startups - nPost
- also categorized in CEO Leadership
- Alibaba Jack Ma's “crazy ideas” at Clinton Global Initiative 2009 ...
- also categorized in CEO Leadership
- How CEOs Can Rebuild Media Companies
- also written by BusinessWeek
- Tapping the Power of Your Morning Routine « Faruk's Blog
- also categorized in CEO Leadership







Recent Comments
Taariq Lewis » 10 Reasons Greedy Jerks make the Worst Leaders by @jonicarley
An excellent piece on how not to be a jerk!
DrJoni » How to be an Unflappable CEO
Unflappability requires centeredness - presence comes from having strength at the core. You can't be ...
See all recent comments